When it comes to wealth management, banks in recent months have been bulking up or thinning out.
The reasons for the two decisions are similar, even though one involves acquisitions and the other divestitures: Success in wealth management demands sizable market share, so banks either have to become big, broad-based players or carve out a niche they can dominate.
Consider recent deals by two banks. The $162 billion-asset Citizens Financial Group in Providence, Rhode Island this month
Those transactions and others show that bank management teams know they must get their product mix and strategic focus exactly right, said Alois Pirker, research director for wealth management at Aite Group. New regulations and rapid tech advances in money management require it, he said.
“You see banks going in both directions, buying and selling, and doing a lot of thinking about what their strategy should be,” Pirker said. “Some are moving from a narrow product offering to a broader solution set. Others have decided they don’t want to be just an also-ran.”
The ingredients are there to stimulate buying. Banks are
Moreover, commercial loan demand is tepid, and deposit costs are expected to start eating into loan margins; buying a wealth management firm is a good way to add fee income.
Executives at the $13.3 billion-asset Union Bankshares in Richmond, Virginia had that in mind with three recent deals, said Casey Whitman, an analyst at Sandler O’Neill. The bank’s
“From a growing-revenue-stream standpoint," Middleburg is "an extremely well-regarded wealth manager,” CEO John Asbury said in an Oct. 5 conference call.
-
Two RIAs turned out to be well-matched, and combined to form a $5 billion firm.
August 22 -
The firm remains in transformational flux, but the results of its "Project E" evolution are beginning to show.
August 1 -
Money pouring into the advisory business is making one prominent banker nervous.
July 22
The heightened importance of noninterest income is also why the $14.9 billion-asset First Midwest Bank in Chicago decided to
“Frankly, it helps us diversify our revenue streams,” Diedrich said. “The Chicagoland market is tough from a competitive perspective, and having a different revenue stream that’s growing at a nice clip is meaningful.”
First Midwest has seen some of its other fee income sources decline as a result of regulations. When the company crossed the $10 billion-asset threshold in 2016, it became subject to the
“The Durbin amendment really impacted us pretty heavily,” Diedrich said.
Still, there are reasons for other banks to pare back in wealth management and focus on a narrower subspecialty.
Some regulations have made it too expensive to just dabble here and there, Pirker said. Banks must train staff to
“With these regulations, it’s obvious you’ve got to upgrade your systems, or you’re better off selling the business,” Pirker said.
The crash of 2008 was intense but, in hindsight, short-lived. Market gains began a few months afterward and have continued with few exceptions.
Nonbank competition to buy wealth management firms, especially from private equity, makes an acquisition strategy pricey, said Chip Roame, managing partner at Tiburon Strategic Advisors. Last month, the private-equity firm Hellman & Friedman acquired Financial Engines for $3 billion and
So expect the shakeout to continue, observers say.
Capital One Financial this year
“We think they’re a perfect fit for Axos’ technology-enabled consumer banking and wealth management services model,” Axos CEO Gregory Garrabrants said in an Oct. 24 conference call. “The integration of robo-advisory services is important to the success of our universal digital bank.”