A Cambodian-American broker who accused Wells Fargo of discrimination won approval from FINRA arbitrators to delete "false and defamatory" statements by the firm from his record.
Under a Dec. 23
Because of the typical lack of detail in the award document, it's not possible to tell "what came of the competing claims for money damages," attorney Robert Herskovits of
"Disclosure of that nature would trigger an investigation by FINRA," Herskovits said. "And if [Wells Fargo] was correct — i.e. the [financial advisor] was structuring deposits — FINRA would seek to bar the individual. Since there is no indication that FINRA has taken any action against Mr. Heng (and more than 2.5 years have passed since the U5 was filed), I am assuming that WF's disclosure was dubious. It certainly seems like the arbitrators thought little of WF's determinations."
The industry's track record
Representatives for Wells Fargo Advisors, which
Heng, who is a military veteran, and his attorney didn't respond to requests for comment.
The nearly 30-year advisor who started his career with Merrill Lynch while on active duty in the U.S. Army now works out of the Roseville, California-based branch of Baird as a member of the Heng, Allen and Vonhof Group,
Heng's award is the latest case to offer a murky lens onto industry workplace practices. A month earlier, two Black advisors dropped a discrimination lawsuit against Merrill that
The involvement of a defamation claim represents
Details missing
Heng's case revolved around the formal reasons that Wells Fargo filed papers for his exit from the firm after 23 years, although the award document didn't reveal the details of the alleged discrimination. Firms that terminate brokers must file an amendment to their permanent record on FINRA's Form U5, which eventually makes its way to their BrokerCheck page. Heng's
Heng "made six cash withdrawals from his personal bank account on six separate days in December 2019," the disclosure stated. "The firm determined the withdrawals were each made in an amount to avoid currency transaction reporting requirements. The [financial advisor] disputes the determination. This activity was not securities- or client-related. No client harm was indicated by the firm's internal review."
In a case filed about a year after his exit from Wells Fargo, Heng accused the firm of discrimination based on race or national origin, wrongful termination, blacklisting, intentional interference with a prospective economic advantage and violation of a California state law prohibiting "unfair" or fraudulent business practices. Wells Fargo denied the allegations, and Heng denied the firm's allegations that he breached the terms of three promissory notes. Wells Fargo filed a counterclaim seeking damages of $1.2 million in unpaid balances, plus interest.
With the exception of Heng's request for expungement of his record, each side dismissed their cases on Dec. 20 "with prejudice," meaning they won't be allowed to file the claim again. Other than stating that Heng filed a notice of partial settlement of his claims against Wells Fargo, the award omitted any information about the financial terms of the agreement. Such settlements often include provisions forbidding the parties from discussing them publicly.
The panel's decision to grant the expungement request provided some clues about the tensions surrounding Heng's departure from his prior brokerage, though. The arbitrators ordered his FINRA language to be replaced with a new disclosure on BrokerCheck stating that the firm alleged the cash withdrawals from Heng's account violated the rules.
"The withdrawals did not violate laws or regulations, and the firm's allegations were false and defamatory," according to the award. "The [financial advisor's] local management opposed the termination decision but were overruled by the firm. The FA did not receive any personal financial benefit from the transactions. This activity was not securities- or client-related. No clients were harmed by the transactions."