Clients of a defunct firm won a $2.9M award. Will they be paid?

Three years after First Standard Financial Company went out of business, its clients are still struggling to get some degree of restitution for their losses.

Nearly a dozen of the former clients seeking millions of dollars in restitution won a $2.9 million award in FINRA arbitration, but it’s not clear whether they’ll be able to collect it. In a Feb. 2 decision, a Seattle panel unanimously ordered Michael Leahy, First Standard’s former chief compliance officer, to pay 11 clients almost their entire requested compensatory damages plus interest, expert witness fees and other costs.

State regulators revoked the registration of Red Bank, New Jersey-based First Standard in October 2019 after accusing the firm of “a fraudulent course of business that consisted of excessive, unsuitable and frequently unauthorized short-term trading in customer accounts that generated commissions for First Standard and its agents at its customers' expense.” Under a consent order that Leahy agreed to on the firm’s behalf with the New Jersey Bureau of Securities the following year, authorities directed First Standard to use its remaining assets to pay $407,476 in restitution — or 5% of the $8.4 million that investigators alleged the clients paid in excessive commissions during its roughly five years of registration.

The case reflects an ongoing discussion among the industry and client advocates about how to solve the problem of the significant number of arbitration awards that go unpaid every year. A new FINRA rule going into effect this year requires “high-risk” brokerages to set aside pools of money for restitution.

“It's a question whether or not this firm would have fallen under this rule as a high-risk firm,” said Christine Lazaro, the director of St. John’s University School of Law’s Securities Arbitration Clinic. “It does seem that the problem itself has remained fairly steady, especially looking at percentages. … That means there's a significant number of investors who are going fully through the process and not being able to recover anything.”

The scope of the issue
Indeed, with 201 unpaid awards amounting to between $91 million in uncollected damages and costs between 2016 and 2020, an average of 23% of the total ordered payouts each year in that span failed to reach claimants, according to FINRA’s latest available statistics. That amount doesn’t include the unknown number of unpaid cases against RIAs that go to forums that are more costly and less transparent than FINRA arbitration claims.

As for this case, Lazaro said she would expect it to go unpaid, although there may be a glimmer of hope based on the fact that Leahy and First Standard’s late owner, Carmine Berardi, tried unsuccessfully to get a different arbitration case against the company vacated in federal court last year.

Leahy, who worked for two other firms that FINRA has expelled from the industry over his 17-year career, has been barred since January 2020, his BrokerCheck file shows. However, Lazaro points out that FINRA lifted a separate suspension five days after the filing in Houston federal court seeking to vacate the award. FINRA had suspended Leahy based on allegations that he failed to comply with an arbitration or settlement or failed to respond to a request for information. In November, the federal judge confirmed the other client’s award of $240,176 while tossing out the First Standard owner and chief compliance officer’s motion to vacate the decision.

“He might have assets that can be collected on, and he might have interest in remaining a broker or coming back as a broker,” Lazaro said. “He didn't just walk away from the other award.”

Attorneys who represented Leahy in that case and the proceedings in New Jersey didn’t respond to requests for comment. Representatives for the state Division of Consumer Affairs, which includes the securities regulator, declined to comment on the status of the restitution and steps the clients may take to secure it.

“While the bureau is not, at this time, able to disclose detail beyond that found in the publicly available consent order, the bureau continues to make all efforts to ensure that the terms of the order are met and restitution is distributed to affected consumers,” Public Information Officer Gema de las Heras said in an email.

The attorney who represented the 11 clients in the latest arbitration case didn’t respond to requests for comment. They filed the case against First Standard, Leahy, Berardi and 10 other former reps in March 2020, accusing them of negligence, negligent misrepresentations, omissions, breaches of fiduciary duty and contract, qualitative and quantitative unsuitability, and other claims. The respondents denied the allegations, with Berardi claiming his own cause of action from a “frivolous assertion of liability,” among other accusations, according to the award document.

In the award, the panel granted all but roughly $140,000 of the requested compensatory damages plus interest of 1.5% annually from Dec. 10 until “the award is paid in full.” In addition, the arbitrators ordered Leahy to pay $25,000 in expert witness fees, $6,050 in hearing session expenses and even the filing fee of $600 paid by the clients. They didn’t assess attorney fees against him, though.

First Standard’s brief but troubled history
While the award document didn’t share many details about the clients’ cases, investigators in New Jersey noted in 2020 that clients had filed at least 31 complaints against former First Standard representatives in the prior two years “alleging unauthorized, excessive, and/or unsuitable trades.”

First Standard’s clearing firm, Dallas-based wealth manager and investment bank Hilltop Securities, had brought client complaints of misconduct to First Standard’s attention after receiving alerts from customers, according to the restitution order.

Representatives for Hilltop declined to comment on the cases or the firm’s relationship with First Standard. Hilltop provided “clearing, holding and account execution services for the firm’s customers” from January 2016 until First Standard terminated its registration with FINRA in November 2019, according to the defunct firm’s detailed BrokerCheck file.

In about a three-year period, First Standard clients sold at least 43% of the securities in their accounts within 30 days of their purchase, 67% within 90 days and 94% by one year, according to investigators. At least 76 of First Standard’s 130 reps had disclosures on their BrokerCheck records, and the bureau alleged that the “fraudulent and systemic trading scheme unjustly enriched First Standard and its agents” to the tune of $28.7 million in commissions and sales charges, the enforcement documents show. The state has revoked the licenses of at least five other reps, according to the bureau’s announcement of its restitution order last year.

“These agents, like many others on First Standard’s roster, took advantage of unsophisticated and novice investors, some of whom trusted them with their life savings and retirement,” Securities Bureau Chief Christopher Gerold said in a statement. “With every new action, we demonstrate that we will not only target rogue firms, but also those individuals who are responsible for the actions of those rogue firms.”

The 11 clients may now seek confirmation of the award in court and pursue the collection of the restitution, despite the potential challenges. Berardi died in November, so the panel dismissed any claims against his estate and said the clients will have to file another case in arbitration or court, the award document states. Berardi had filed for bankruptcy protection on behalf of First Standard in March, according to the court documents from the other arbitration case.

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Regulation and compliance Arbitration Risk
MORE FROM FINANCIAL PLANNING