Advisor's suit accuses LPL of raiding $450M book of business

lpl
Bloomberg News

Mark Lamkin says everything had gone well for years while his independent firm managed roughly $450 million through an affiliation with LPL Financial.

Then came his discovery that a pair of his associates were placing clients in allegedly unsuitable private investments. That set in motion a series of events eventually leading to the loss of the entire book of business, said Lamkin, the founder of Louisville, Kentucky-based Lamkin Wealth Management.

In a lawsuit first filed in Kentucky state court and moved into federal court in Louisville on Monday, Lamkin contends his attempts to help the affected clients recoup their losses led to retaliation and his eventual termination in August 2018.

Meanwhile, the suit alleges, some of his former associates conspired behind his back to keep their practice and more than $451 million under management at LPL. Now Lamkin's asking for the firm to pay him $10 million — the value of his former book had he been able to sell it — plus another $10 million in punitive damages.

"In the last five years, I had to start completely over because of LPL," said Lamkin, who is back to managing close to $250 million through an affiliation with the independent broker-dealer and advisory firm Calton & Associates.

READ MORE:
LPL's largest termination ever
Independent wealth managers punish ex-financial advisors
LPL's $6M fine may be 'cost of doing business' or a Reg BI warning
LPL's profits climbed 26% despite soaring expenses
LPL launches W-2 private wealth channel, aiming at wirehouses

"That book represented 18 years of my life's work," Lamkin added. "I probably could have sold it and retired on it. That's why I'm upset."

Lamkin's suit accuses LPL, the largest independent broker-dealer in the U.S., of four counts of wrongful interference with clients, advisors and others. Lamkin's lawyers, John Cox and Scott Spiegel of Louisville, Kentucky-based Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman did not respond to requests for comment; nor did LPL.

Bill Singer, a longtime securities lawyer and recently retired author of the Broker and Broker blog, said the dispute strikes him as an example of how a firm like Lamkin's might not enjoy as much independence with a broker-dealer like LPL as it had expected. 

"What we ultimately have is a marriage of convenience," Singer said in an email. "But, as with many marriages, when discord arises, we tend to have unsavory divorces."

He said many firms in situations similar to Lamkin's think their independent status means they can leave their affiliated broker-dealer with little resistance.

"The reality is often far different," Singer said, "and all the more so when a 'team' that operated the introducing firm has a division in its own ranks and some folks want to leave and others want to stay."

Lamkin, who was with LPL from 2001 to 2018, said all was going well with the independent broker-dealer until he learned that Don and Jason Woods, father and son advisors at LMW, had allegedly skirted regulations to place clients in risky private investments. Lamkin said the Woodses, who are no longer in the industry, were inflating the net worth of more than 20 customers to have them qualify as "accredited investors."

Accreditation is something investors often have to obtain before they can put money into private equity, credit or real estate funds. To qualify, a person must have $1 million in net worth (not counting the value of their primary residence) or at least $200,000 in annual income in each of the two previous years.

According to the BrokerCheck online database, Don Woods settled with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in May 2020 for nearly $16,000 over allegations that he "overstated the customers' liquid net worth in order to circumvent his member firm's restrictions." He neither admitted nor denied FINRA's charges. 

Don Woods has a total of 14 disclosures on his record, most of them related to allegations about unsuitable investments. Jason Woods has 9 disclosures alleging similar violations.

Lamkin, whose lawsuit was first reported by the industry publication Financial Advisor IQ, said he fired the two after discovering the alleged improper activity. He soon began working with outside legal counsel to have the affected clients reimbursed for any losses. At one point, he said, LPL representatives asked him if he was "negotiating against us" and said they'd prefer to settle any customer disputes.

"Then they subjected me to three audits in one year," Lamkin said. "They hired an ex-FBI agent to rip up my office because they were going to find something. And all this when not a year before they gave me a six-figure bonus to stay on."

Lamkin was discharged by LPL on Aug. 17, 2018, after he was found to have not properly reported loans received from a client. Lamkin's lawsuit states the loan had been arranged according to advice from LPL and that LPL had assured him the loan didn't have to be reported.

"These allegations have been conjured up by LPL as a subterfuge, to justify its efforts to damage my reputation and, as a result, take my customers," Lamkin wrote on his BrokerCheck page.

While all this was going on, according to the suit, Lamkin was looking to move his practice elsewhere. Lamkin, the lawsuit states, received repeated assurances from three of his former associates — Bruce Lindsay, Jonathan Upton and Gregory Smith — that they would stay with him through the transfer.

His suit accuses LPL of "creating an atmosphere of fear and intimidation" that made the three unwilling to depart despite what they had said. It also alleges that Lindsay, Upton and Smith were encouraging Lamkin to leave "while preparing to steal all of [Lamkin Wealth Management's] business."

Lamkin said he is separately suing the three in state court and is also pursuing a claim against LPL through FINRA. Lindsay, Upton and Smith are all listed as representatives of Keystone Financial Group, an LPL-affiliated firm with offices throughout Kentucky. Attempts to reach them through the firm were unsuccessful.

Lamkin said two of his other associates were discharged by LPL shortly after he was. Christopher "Neil" Watkins was let go in November 2018 after being accused of helping distribute advisory fees to an unregistered person. In a response on his BrokerCheck page, Watkins denied the allegations. "Any advisory fee monies payable to or received by me ended up in the firm's bank account and were used for firm expenses, including payroll and other overhead," he wrote.

Waktins is now listed as a representative of Magnate Advisory Services, an investment advisory in Louisville. Attempts to reach him at that firm were unsuccessful.

Doug Obradovich, who still works with Lamkin, was also let go from LPL in November 2018 after being accused of helping to distribute commissions to a nonregistered person. Obradovich denied the allegations on his BrokerCheck page. "Any commission monies payable to or received by me ended up in the firm's bank account and were used for firm expenses, including payroll and other overhead," Obradovich wrote on the page.

Lamkin said LPL meanwhile is seeking reimbursement for money it claims he still owes on a promissory note from the firm. Lamkin said the amount in question in that dispute is about $600,000.

Lamkin's own BrokerCheck page lists seven disclosures, most of them having to do with his time at LPL. He settled his dispute over the unreported loans in March 2020 for $7,500. The loans, coming to nearly $1.3 million, were made to Lamkin, his wife and an LLC of which he was a member, according to BrokerCheck.

In May 2019, Lamkin agreed to pay $1,000 to settle allegations brought by Kentucky securities regulators that he had conducted business in the state without being properly registered. Lamkin states in his lawsuit that the disputed transactions occurred when he was in the midst of leaving LPL and was actually still in control of his practice. In December 2000, he resigned from PNC Brokerage after he failed to report to the firm management that an associate had accessed his bank account without his knowledge. 

Lamkin said he believes the lesson from his case is that independent advisors should be careful about which firms they choose to affiliate with.

"I love the independent model, and I think it's fantastic," Lamkin said. "But you better check the record of the company you choose to work with."

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Practice and client management Career moves Lawsuits Litigation Independent advisors RIAs LPL Financial
MORE FROM FINANCIAL PLANNING