Welcome back to
Doctors need doctors.
Lawyers need lawyers.
But do financial advisors need their own financial advisors?
That's the question a financial advisor in North Carolina asks his fellow professionals this week. He has a family to think about. He doesn't want to wait until disaster strikes and understands the value in being prepared beforehand to ensure they'll be taken care of. He is curious about what other financial advisors have done. He wants to know if it's a good idea and, if so, what criteria they use to figure out who the best person for the job is.
READ MORE:
For help, he turned to his fellow advisors. Here's what he wrote:
Dear advisors,
You've heard the saying that "the cobbler's children have no shoes" — I want to avoid that type of situation.
I have been an advisor for two years, following a 30-plus career in technology. Now I am looking into engaging an independent financial advisor for my family, as my wife and two grown daughters will need professional financial advice if something happens to me, and I want to establish a professional relationship with that advisor before something happens.
I intend to find a fee-only advisor who is willing to offer an advice-only model, i.e., it doesn't need to move my assets under their management. I'm curious about what other advisors in my position have done.
Advisors — do you use an independent financial advisor for your own family? If so, what were the key factors in deciding the type of financial advisor to engage with and then hire them?
Sincerely,
Ray Eustace, Accredited Asset Management Specialist
Cary, North Carolina
And here's what financial advisors wrote back: