Welcome back to "
Contributing to a 401(k) is, in many ways, an act of faith. Handing over a cut of every paycheck, we trust the faceless money managers behind the plan to guide our money into safe, reliable and — in the long run — profitable investments that we'll one day rely on to fund our retirement.
But in the back of some savers' minds, a nagging question lingers: Could I do better on my own?
At its root, this question is a form of the age-old debate between
Multiple studies have shown that the latter approach works better in the long run. Researchers at Morningstar, for example, found that
"If you like spending six to eight hours per week working on investments, do it," Buffett
READ MORE:
And yet
A young engineer in Providence, Rhode Island, is struggling with the retirement corollary of this question: Could he do better than his 401(k)? Here's what he wrote:
Dear advisors,
How much should I take the D.I.Y. approach to my retirement savings?
I'm a 25-year-old engineer, and I have both a 401(k) and a Fidelity account for my own investments. But the amount I put into each feels arbitrary, and I'm thinking of shifting some money from my 401(k) to my investment account.
My salary is $67,000, and I'm contributing 22% of my paycheck to my 401(k). Every week, I put about $300 in that retirement plan and $100 in my Fidelity account. Right now the Fidelity is entirely invested in the
Is there anything to gain by putting less savings in my 401(k) and more in my own portfolio? All of these savings are for my retirement, but I'm not sure what the ratio should be. How should I divvy it up?
Sincerely,
Puzzled in Providence
And here's what financial advisors wrote back: